Case study · 01LIVE

Preparing people for the conversation that decides their citizenship.

KonzulAI · SaaS · EdTech / GovTech

Konzul is an AI-powered Hungarian citizenship interview simulator designed to recreate the unpredictability of a real consular conversation rather than simply test memorised answers.

Visit Konzul
Role
Founder / Product / UX / AI implementation
Product
AI interview-preparation SaaS
Users
Applicants for Hungarian simplified naturalization
Status
Live
Year
2026
The Konzul homepage, showing the Hungarian citizenship interview preparation product
The problem

Passing isn't about memorizing answers.

Preparing for a naturalization interview is fundamentally different from preparing for a language exam. Applicants have to understand unpredictable questions, answer naturally in Hungarian, respond to follow-up questions and maintain a conversation under pressure.

Traditional vocabulary exercises, flashcards and static lists of interview questions do not recreate that experience.

Static preparation
  1. Question
  2. Prepared answer
Real conversation
  1. Question
  2. Answer
  3. Follow-up
  4. Clarification
  5. Unexpected direction
  6. New question
The insight

The product shouldn't teach the interview. It should behave like the interviewer.

The central product decision was to treat the AI as a simulation environment rather than a tutor. A realistic consul cannot simply draw questions randomly from a fixed database. The system needs to understand the conversation, react to what the applicant says and decide what a plausible interviewer would ask next.

  1. User answer
  2. Conversation context
  3. Consul behaviour
  4. Adaptive follow-up
  5. Evaluation
The product
01

A realistic conversation, not a quiz

The interaction is designed as one continuous interview rather than a sequence of isolated language questions. The applicant enters a conversation that has a beginning, a direction and a momentum of its own, which is closer to what actually happens in front of a consul.

02

Follow-ups based on what the applicant actually says

Follow-up questions depend on the conversational context instead of walking down a predetermined question tree. An incomplete or vague answer can be probed further, and a mentioned detail can become the subject of the next question.

03

Feedback after the conversation

Evaluation and feedback are delivered once the simulation ends, so the applicant can understand weaknesses without the live interview turning into a language lesson while it is happening.

Product decisions

Four decisions that define the product.

D01

Dynamic, not scripted

A rigid interview tree would eventually become learnable. Contextual follow-ups make repeated sessions less predictable.

Trade-off

Less control over the exact path of any single session, in exchange for staying closer to the actual experience being prepared for.

D02

Realistic, not overly helpful

General-purpose AI tends to help users. During a simulation, too much assistance undermines the purpose of the product.

Trade-off

The consul behaviour prioritizes interview realism over being a friendly tutor, which makes the experience deliberately less comfortable.

D03

Personal context without unnecessary data collection

The simulation benefits from knowing enough about the applicant to ask plausible questions.

Trade-off

The product avoids storing unnecessary sensitive conversational data, accepting less personalisation than would technically be possible.

D04

Feedback without breaking immersion

Correction during every answer would turn the experience into a lesson rather than a simulation.

Trade-off

Evaluation is separated from the interview itself, so useful corrections arrive later rather than in the moment.

How it works

More than a chat interface.

The interview interface is only the surface. Underneath it, the conversation is held as state so the AI consul is answering to a conversation rather than to an isolated message, and the behaviour it follows is deliberately constrained rather than left to the model's defaults.

The result is a simulation with designed behaviour and product logic, instead of a chat window placed in front of a language model.

  1. Applicant
  2. Interview interface
  3. Conversation state
  4. AI consul
  5. Adaptive response
  6. Post-interview evaluation
The AI consul is informed by
  • Conversation context
  • Interview behaviour and rules
  • Applicant context, where appropriate
Iteration

Building realism meant removing some of AI's natural helpfulness.

Initial challenge

General AI behaviour naturally tends toward being cooperative, explanatory and helpful.

Why that is a problem

A consul simulation becomes less useful if the interviewer continually assists the applicant.

Product response

The interview behaviour and prompting were designed to keep the simulation focused on realistic questioning, contextual follow-ups and appropriate pressure rather than tutoring during the interview.

Outcome

From a personal preparation problem to a live product.

LIVE

Konzul is now a publicly available product with the core experience running end to end: account creation, interview simulation, adaptive conversation, feedback and payment.

Visit Konzul
Lessons
01

Simulation quality matters more than raw model intelligence.

A powerful model does not automatically produce a convincing product experience. Behaviour, context and constraints matter enormously.

02

Sometimes a better AI product requires making the AI less helpful.

The model's natural tendency to assist can conflict with the purpose of a simulation product.

03

Privacy constraints should influence product design from the beginning.

Collecting less information is preferable when the product can achieve its objective without retaining unnecessary personal data.

Preparing for your own interview?

Konzul is live and available to try.

Visit Konzul